Recent developments

Welcome to the May technical briefing, an update of technical developments for financial advisers for the period from 26 March 2025 to 22 April 2025.

Since the prior technical briefing the Federal Election has been announced and held. The effect of announcing the election is that all bills in Parliament that are not yet passed lapse. Most notable of these is the bill that proposed Division 296 tax for those with super balances over $3 million. We’ll wait to see what the new Government has in store for the financial advice industry.  

In this edition, we cover the recent reduction to the lowest marginal tax rate and the social security debt waiver for those commuting complying pensions. In the adviser query of the month, we cover the rules that determine the minimum pension requirement for a death benefit pension in the year of death.

Adviser query of the month

    Death benefits and the minimum pension requirement

    Question

    My client’s husband passed away in February 2025 while receiving an account-based pension (ABP) that commenced 10 years ago. The spouse is now receiving the death benefit as an ABP.

    How is the minimum pension for the 2025-26 year calculated?

    Answer

    Ensuring the minimum pension is paid during the year is a key requirement to maintain the tax-free status of earnings within the pension.

    Failure to pay the minimum pension can result in the pension being treated as ceasing from the start of the financial year and earnings within the pension will be subject to tax. There are additional tax implications of failing to pay the minimum pension, such as transfer balance cap transactions and a recalculation of the tax components. In addition, all payments will be regarded as lump sums. Further information can be found in the 'when minimum pension standards aren’t met' article on the ATO site.

    There are circumstances when the ATO will allow the pension to continue for tax purposes. Further information can be found in the exception to minimum pension payment requirements section of on the ATO site.

    The following table summarises the minimum pension requirement for an APB in the year of death under various scenarios:

    ScenarioType of account held by deceasedDeath pension paid due to reversionary nomination?Deceased’s account - minimum pension up to date of deathBeneficiary’s account – minimum pension

    1

    ABP

    Yes

    • Existing pension considered to continue to beneficiary
    • Beneficiary takes on minimum calculated for deceased**
    • Sum of pension payments to deceased and beneficiary count towards the minimum for the year
    • No minimum if deceased commences pension and dies in June of same year

    2

    ABP

    No

    • Pension ceases on death
    • No minimum pension required before death
    • Considered a new pension
    • Pro-rate minimum based on number of days in financial year (including commencement day)
    • Percentage factor based on beneficiary’s age at commencement
    • No minimum if beneficiary’s pension commences in June

    3

    Accumulation

    N/A*

    N/A

    • Pro-rate minimum based on number of days in financial year (including commencement day)
    • Percentage factor based on beneficiary’s age at commencement
    • No minimum if beneficiary’s pension commences in June

     

    * Reversionary nominations are a continuation of the pre-death pension and therefore don’t apply to accumulation accounts

    ** In the year after death, the minimum payment percentage is based on the beneficiary’s age at 1 July

    In this client’s circumstances, the spouse falls into either scenario one or two.

    In the case of scenario one, where they receive the death benefit pension due to a reversionary nomination, then the deceased’s minimum pension is carried over to the beneficiary.

    In the case of scenario two, where the ABP is not paid due to a reversionary nomination (e.g. there was a non-lapsing nomination, binding lapsing nomination, non-binding nomination or no nomination), the ABP is considered a new pension and the minimum pension is pro-rated based on the beneficiary’s age at the time it commences.

    The table above assumes the individual beneficiary doesn’t commute the pension in full before the end of the financial year. Were this to occur, any minimum pension would need to be pro-rated to account for the reduction in days the pension was running.

    If the deceased had a transition to retirement income stream (TRIS) at the time of death, then scenarios one and two in the table above apply. In addition:

    • The death benefit pension (whether reversionary or not) is considered to be in the tax-free pension phase
    • The annual 10 per cent maximum pension rule no longer applies
    • The limitation regarding lump sum payments no longer applies.

    If the deceased had a market-linked pension/term allocated pension (TAP) at the time of death, then the following apply:

    • For pensions with a reversionary nomination, scenario one in the table applies
    • For non-reversionary nominations, the TAP ceases at the time of death. For a beneficiary who is eligible to receive a pension, they will be able to take a pension, lump sum or a combination of the two. A death benefit pension is a new pension. The beneficiary can choose the type of pension (eg ABP) that suits their circumstances.

    Legislative developments

    Bills

    Cuts to the personal income tax rate

    Further to the prior Government’s 2025-26 Federal Budget announcement to reduce the lowest marginal tax rate from 2026-27, the Treasury Laws Amendment (More Cost of Living Relief) Bill 2025 was introduced to Parliament and has been passed by both houses and is now law.

    The current and future tax rates as now legislated are as follows:

     2024-25 and 2025-262026-272027-28
    Up to $18,200NilNilNil
    $18,201 - $45,000

    Nil + 16%

    Nil + 15%Nil + 14%
    $45,001 - $135,000$4,288 + 30%$4,020 + 30%$3,752 + 30%

    $135,001 - $190,000

    $31,288 +37%$31,020 + 37%$30,752 + 37%
    Above $190,000

    $51,638 + 45%

    $51,370 + 45%$51,102 + 45%

    This Bill has also legislated the 2024-25 Medicare Levy thresholds as announced in the 2025-26 Federal Budget. The new thresholds are:

     

     

    SinglesFamilies (combined income)Medicare levy rate

    Up to $27,222

    Up to $45,907*

    Nil

    $27,223 - $34,027

    $45,908* - $57,383**

    10% of taxable income between thresholds

    Above $34,027

    Above $57,383**

    2% of taxable income

     

     

    Eligible for Seniors and Pensioners Tax Offset

    Medicare levy rate

    Up to $43,020

    Up to $59,886*

    Nil

    $43,021 - $53,775

    $59,887* - $74,857**

    10% of taxable income between thresholds

    Above $53,775

    Above $74,857**

    2% of taxable income

    * Plus $4,216 for each dependent child or student

    ** Plus $5,270 for each dependent child or student

    Further information can be found here: Treasury Laws Amendment (More Cost of Living Relief) Bill 2025

    Legislative instruments

    Centrelink/DVA debt waiver – complying pension commutations

    On the 28th of March 2025 the Government registered a legislative instrument, Social Security (Waiver of Debts – Legacy Product Conversions) Specification 2025, to provide social security debt relief for any debts that may arise due to people commuting legacy pensions under new rules that commenced on 7 December 2024. Refer to the links below for more information on the new commutation rules and the social security debt that can arise in these circumstances.

    This instrument is a welcomed change and reflects the intent that Centrelink/DVA recipients won’t be penalised for choosing to commute their complying pensions. That said, the challenge with this instrument is the disallowance period which effectively means that this change doesn’t commence until it is tabled in Parliament and 15 sitting days have passed. Given the recent election, it could be sometime before parliament sits again.

    Despite the intent of this debt waiver and the prior Government, there is a risk for any Centrelink/DVA recipients who commute their pensions before this instrument takes effect. As such, for those Centrelink/DVA recipients who have benefited from the assets test exemption (part or full) that their complying pension has offered, it may be advisable to wait until this instrument takes effect.

    Further information can be found here: Social Security (Waiver of Debts – Legacy Product Conversions) Specification 2025

    Further information regarding the complying pension amnesty can be found in the February 2025 technical briefing: Legislative Developments and Adviser Query of the Month.

    Regulator developments

    ATO

    Super thresholds page update

    The ATO has updated its Key super rates and thresholds page for the 2025-26. A number of key caps and thresholds for the current and following financial year are shown below:

    Rate/threshold

    2024-25

    2025-26

    Super guarantee (SG) percentage

    11.5%

    12%

    SG – maximum quarterly base / SG payment

    $65,070 / $7,483.05

    $62,500* / $7,500

    Small business CGT cap – lifetime limit

    $1,780,000

    $1,865,000

    Concessional contribution cap

    $30,000

    $30,000

    Non-concessional contribution (NCC) cap (one year)

    $120,000

    $120,000

    General transfer balance cap

    $1,900,000

    $2,000,000

    Untaxed plan cap amount

    $1,780,000

    $1,865,000

     

     

    NCC cap

    TSB thresholds – 2024-25

    TSB thresholds – 2025-26

    3 years cap

    $360,000

    Less than $1,660,000

    Less than $1,760,000

    2 years cap

    $240,000

    At least $1,660,000 and less than $1,780,000

    At least $1,760,000 and less than $1,880,000

    1 year cap

    $120,000

    At least $1,780,000 and less than $1,900,000

    At least $1,880,000 and less than $2,000,000

    No cap

    $Nil

    $1,900,000 and above

    $2,000,000 and above

    Note: The NCC caps assume the individual hasn’t triggered the bring forward rule and is in a bring forward period.

    Further information can be found here: ATO Key rates and thresholds

    ASIC

    Report 806 – Taking ownership of death benefits: How trustees can deliver outcomes Australians deserve

    On 31 March 2025 ASIC released a report detailing their findings from a review of death benefit claims with 10 super trustees over a two-year period ending 31 March 2024. This is ASIC’s first phase of its member services project.

    The report notes both good and practices. Some of statistics noted in the report were:

    • No trustees monitored or reported on end-to end death benefit claims handling
    • 27% of claim files reviewed involved poor customer service
    • 8% vs 48% was the difference in claims closed in 90 days between the slowest and the fastest trustee
    • Members living in First Nations postcodes generally experienced greater delays than other members
    • 78% of claim files reviewed were delayed by processing issues within the trustee’s control
    • 17% of claim files reviewed had claimants who were experiencing vulnerability
    • Claims with binding nominations were processed faster than non-binding or no nomination claims

    The report contains 34 recommendations for trustees. On ASIC’s website, ASIC Commissioner Simone Constant has noted a range of areas trustees should focus on, including:

    • Better customer service and faster response times
    • Improved monitoring and reporting on claims handling timeframes
    • Streamlined processes and procedures
    • Better guidance and training for staff
    • Removing barriers for First Nations members and claimants
    • Clearer communications and more support for members.

    Further information can be found here: REP 806 Taking ownership of death benefits: How trustees can deliver outcomes Australians deserve

    Other topics of interest

    AFCA article

    How AFCA calculates a loss

    AFCA has released an article titled ‘How does AFCA calculate loss? What financial advisers need to know’. The article covers the different ways a loss is calculated when it upholds a financial advice complain. The methodology chosen by AFCA depends on the circumstances of the case.

    One method that is used is the ‘no transaction’ approach. This is used where the individual would not have transacted had they received the appropriate advice. In this scenario AFCA will compare their current position to the position they would be in had they not taken any action.

    Where the ‘no transaction’ methodology doesn’t work, AFCA may apply the ‘estimate’ approach based on the client’s risk profile and an appropriate market benchmark.

    AFCA note that they’re often asked why they don’t use a ‘pure capital loss’ approach based solely on the decline in a specific investment. They note that the approach taken should take into consideration the market exposure the client should have had had the advice been appropriate.

    Further information can be found here: How does AFCA calculate loss? What financial advisers need to know

    Important information

    This information is provided by Macquarie Investment Management Limited ABN 66 002 867 003 AFSL 237 492 (MIML or We). MIML is not an authorised deposit-taking institution for the purposes of the Banking Act 1959 (Cth), and MIML’s obligations do not represent deposits or other liabilities of Macquarie Bank Limited ABN 46 008 583 542, AFSL 237502. Any investments are subject to investment risk including possible delays in repayment and loss of income and principal invested. Macquarie Bank Limited does not guarantee or otherwise provide assurance in respect of the obligations of MIML.

    This information is provided for the use of financial services professionals only. In no circumstances is it to be used by a potential investor or client for the purposes of making a decision about a financial product or class of products.

    The information provided is not personal advice. It does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular investor and should not be relied upon as advice. Any examples are illustrations only and any similarities to any readers’ circumstances are purely coincidental.

    While the information provided here is given in good faith and is believed to be accurate and reliable as at the date of preparation, 22 April 2025, it is provided by MIML for information only. Neither MIML, nor any member of the Macquarie Group gives any warranty as to the reliability or accuracy of the information, nor accepts any responsibility for any errors or omissions. MIML does not accept any responsibility for information provided by third parties that is included in this document. We accept no obligation to correct or update the information or opinions in it. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. MIML will not be liable for any direct, indirect, consequential or other loss arising from reliance on this information.

    MIML does not give, nor purport to give, any taxation advice. The application of taxation laws to each client depends on that client’s individual circumstances. Accordingly, clients should seek independent professional advice on taxation implications before making any decisions about a financial product or class of products.

    Copyright 2025 Macquarie Group Limited.